One career, expressed through three connected roles.

Each area below has a different purpose: clinical and educational expertise, independent medico-legal analysis, and advocacy for children with complex medical needs.

01

Pediatric Nephrologist & Medical Educator

His clinical work centers on pediatrics and pediatric kidney disease. Alongside patient care, he has taught medical students and residents, developed faculty and held academic leadership roles as an academic pediatric expert witness, preparing physicians to think carefully and practice responsibly

02

Medical Expert Witness & Healthcare Leader

His work as a pediatric nephrology expert witness draws on clinical care, medical administration, managed care and organizational leadershi

03

Advocate for Children with Complex Medical Needs

His work with children extends beyond the clinic through healthcare access, Medicaid leadership and long-term service with the Children’s Association for Maximum Potential, which he helped establish with two other physicians.

A Lifetime Of Leadership In Pediatric Medicine.

From clinical practice and academic medicine to military leadership and hospital administration, Dr. McCurdy’s career has been defined by service, scholarship, and expertise.

The consistent thread is public service: caring for children, educating physicians and improving the systems that support both.

Dr. McCurdy’s professional background combines direct clinical judgment with the wider perspective of an educator, administrator and military physician.

After completing pediatric training within the military and a fellowship in pediatric nephrology, he practiced and taught in military and academic medical settings, now informing his work as a retired military physician expert witness. His active military service ran in parallel with his residency, subspecialty training and the early decades of his academic career.

He later held faculty and leadership positions in medical schools and pediatric programs, including responsibilities in curriculum, faculty development and medical-student education. His healthcare leadership work expanded into medical administration, managed care, population health and Medicaid services for children with disabilities and special healthcare needs.
Today, that combined experience informs his approach to medico-legal consultation. He reviews the medical record, identifies the relevant clinical questions, considers the applicable evidence and communicates both the conclusions and the limitations with clarity.

Clinical medicine

Pediatrics and pediatric nephrology

Education & leadership

Teaching, curriculum and healthcare administration

Public service

Military medicine and advocacy for children

Experience Backed By Distinguished Credentials.

As a board-certified pediatric nephrologist expert witness, his education, certifications and military service reflect a career in pediatric medicine.

Education & Clinical Training

MD, with Distinction

University of Nebraska Medical Center

1976

PhD, Interdisciplinary Medical Science, with Distinction

University of Nebraska Medical Center

1976

Pediatrics Internship & Residency

Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center

1976–1979

Fellowship, Pediatric Nephrology

University of Minnesota Health Sciences Center

1979–1981

MBA

University of Nebraska at Omaha

2001

Certification & Recognition

MBA

University of Nebraska at Omaha, 2001

1980

Board-Certified Pediatric Nephrology

American Board of Pediatrics, 1982

1982

Alpha Omega Alpha

Medical honor society

2003

FAAP & FACPE

Professional fellowships

Service

Alpha Omega Alpha & Sigma Xi

Medical and scientific honor societies

Honor

FAAP & FACPE

Selected professional fellowships

Fellow

Review the medico-legal CV

As a medico-legal consultant, Dr. McCurdy’s approved CV lists appointments, teaching, committee service, publications and presentations.

Facts first. Nuance matters.

Medicine is rarely a simple yes-or-no proposition. The responsibility is to gather the facts, explain the shades of grey and provide an independent opinion—even when the conclusion is not the one a party hoped to hear.

Independent analysis

Opinions are based on the medical record, relevant standards and supporting literature—not on the desired outcome.

Clear communication

Complex medical issues are organized and explained in direct language that attorneys and decision-makers can use.

Appropriate uncertainty

Where the evidence is incomplete or medicine permits more than one reasonable interpretation, those limitations are stated plainly.